+A Modest Proposal + +What can be done about museums and critics? + +I do not advocate that museums cease exhibiting Modern Academic Art. +However, I do suggest that in fairness to today's polarized extremes +in taste, museums should have two different curators. One for each +side of the art debate. They could then compete by means of the +artwork they each choose to hang and engage in lively debates. People +will then have an opportunity to see the work of both sides of the art +debate and decide what they prefer for themselves. If this were to +happen the censored approach of the last 60 years would end.
Problem is, you'd have to queue to get into the non-abstract exhibits
Australia's biggest Art award/sale is held annually in Camberwell, Victoria. It attracts over 3000 entries of which some 2000 are hung on display. Over a weekend, more than ten thousand people stand in long queues waiting to view the exhibition and sales increase each year. Over $50,000 worth of awards are handed out to painters in a variety of media and price categories. The exhibition grows in popularity every year.
The Camberwell Rotary Art Award is an entirely realist exhibition.
Despite this, visitors to the West Australian Art Gallery will see three galleries filled with aboriginal dot paintings and the remainder filled with abstract work of one form or another. There used to be one large Heysen painting - over 100 years old - but even that's disappeared. Occasionally, a lucky visitor will see the small sign pointing to a second gallery, in a separate building, which houses the works of Australia's earliest painters. I've spoken to many artists who are completely unaware this hidden gallery even exists. Most assume the WAAG doesn't have any realist art at all (in fact, it has a massive collection - it just hides it).
Prizes in local art awards judged by senior WAAG staff always go to 'abstract' work, regardless of the variety or standard of other work.
Similarly, our major fine arts college actively discourages the pursuit of 'realism'. A few acquaintances who've attended have told of lecturers who will throw a realist piece on the floor and step on it, insisting that students 'explore their creative conscience' - or words to that effect.
Both these establishments are publicly funded and yet it's clear that both are entirely out of touch with reality and public opinion and have a one-eyed definition of what constitutes 'art'.
Andy D.
'I'm a great speller - but a hopless tpyist!'