|
By George, I think you're on to something, Jiri. Unless the rules have changed, this is an improper use of the term 'multiple originals' which, as I've always understood it, refers to artist pulled prints where no original exists. I.E. etchings, lithos, serigraphs and the like. I don't understand how the following statement is valid since the artist was simply the designer, not the creator: (taken from the site)
'There are three price levels for these exquisite works of art. 'Multiple Original' is the term used to describe works designed by Ulla, and painted by her studio artists. These works are the least expensive. The Multiple Original 'Moonscapes,' 'Landscapes,' 'Ibis,' and 'Peacock' designs cost a little more. Multiple Originals have been designed by Ulla Darni for collectors and designers who want quality glass art in an affordable price range. The Original works painted by Ulla Darni herself, however, are the traditional florals and floral abstracts. These are all one of a kind pieces, and therefore more collectible and more expensive. Within these three ranges, price varies according to the size of each piece.'
|
