My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
VertinMon
Junior Boarder
Posts: 33
graphgraph
User Offline
 
says...

I'm sure everyone will join me in wishing you get an 'A' for your effort/paper.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
alfacolin
Senior Boarder
Posts: 42
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Since you do not find my posts worthwhile, I'm sure everyone will join me in wishing you refrain from responding to them anymore.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
VIAGRA-VIAGRA
Senior Boarder
Posts: 42
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Mondrian

Tired of Modern Art? check
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
0Kelvin
Senior Boarder
Posts: 55
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Do you know anything about the origin of

I don't know if Mondrian used such a term, but it has been used by artists to describe the space around an object for my whole life. It gets a little awkward, though, when one needs to distinguish between two types of negative space (positive and neutral), as I have had to do here.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
mysticwizard
Senior Boarder
Posts: 44
graphgraph
User Offline
 
What a man has to do.. but I agree with you about this cubist tension in this painting. The lower vertical lines in the latticework create an impresson of a physical ground under the three. These darker areas under the tree with some light reflection work different from the other dark/light (positive and neutral negative space) areas in the upper part of the background.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
manchop
Senior Boarder
Posts: 43
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The lower vertical lines in the latticework create

I notice this now that you have pointed it out.

I had thought that Mondrian established a sort of floor by elongated horizontal lines a little above these darker patches.

I do not get a sense Mondrian really cared about establishing a realistic 3-d space.

I don't quite see the function of the darker patches, unless they are meant to suggest shadow.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
Ducati999
Senior Boarder
Posts: 59
graphgraph
User Offline
 
It is strange this painting and quite difficult to get a grasp of. Some shadows are 'cubist' and others are 'landscape', I believe. Then he used/changed the forms of the tree, too. Mondrian may have given some account of what he was doing in these years. He's moving out of 3D, but I don't know how far away he is at the time.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
0Kelvin
Senior Boarder
Posts: 55
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Then

You can see the evolution of Mondrian's approach on the second URL in the first post of this thread. In 1908 he did 'Red Tree.' In 1911, he did 'Horizontal Tree.' Then in 1912, he painted 'Apple Trees,' which is not really trees but one tree. I think he was doing versions of the same tree in all three paintings and getting more abstract with each one. The first one, 'Red Tree,' is the most realistic. It looks strongly influenced by Van Gogh.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 Pablo Picasso Club